Mr Hissink is on the list of 400
Anyway Louis claims that he is not on the list of the 400 scientists against Global Warming. When I point out that the he is he denies that he knew he was on it.
________________________________________ start of extract ________________________________
Louis - "SJT has not read the list because if he/she had, he/she would realise I am not on it. So that makes his/her comment above not something one would expect from someone in full command of all the facts."
Is this you or the evil robot Louis that is impersonating you????????
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport
"Planetology, School of Ocean Earth Sciences and Technology, University of Hawai'i at Manoa; Albrecht Glatzle, PhD, sc.agr., Agro-Biologist and Gerente ejecutivo, INTTAS, Paraguay; Fred Goldberg, PhD, Adj Professor, Royal Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden;
Louis Hissink M.Sc. M.A.I.G., Editor AIG News and Consulting Geologist, Perth, Western Australia;
Andrei Illarionov, PhD, Senior Fellow, Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity, U.S.; founder and director of the Institute of Economic Analysis, Russia; Jon Jenkins, PhD, MD, computer modelling - virology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; "
Posted by: Ender at January 4, 2008 08:55 PM
Why Ender,
Thank you, I hadn't realised I was so notorious. I have erred! I am on the list, not only as one of the 100 but now one of the 400!
Mind you, you have shot yourself in the foot as I have never initiated a law suit (Your post previous to the one above), so I can only assume that the hysterical ranting from you and SJT here means than you (collectively) consider me as a serious threat to your dogma.
Still waiting for the empirical (read experimental) support for your Oil theory, by the way.
Posted by: Louis Hissink at January 4, 2008 09:56 PM
Given the denseness here, I opted to sign the list of 100, but I had no idea I was included on the list of 400, and would not until Ender corrected me.
Nonetheless, it's an honour.
And keep an eye on Henry Thornton folks, because the editor there has asked I amplify some points. Pure science of course, physics included, which should amuse SJT who thinks I don't have any credibility in that area.
Physics that is.
Posted by: Louis Hissink at January 4, 2008 10:05 PM
Posted by: Mark at January 4, 2008 11:16 PM
Louis - "Thank you, I hadn't realised I was so notorious. I have erred! I am on the list, not only as one of the 100 but now one of the 400!"
Thats alright Louis always a pleasure. Now this question rears it's ugly head. If Louis really did not know that he was not on the list then how many of the others also do not know they are on the list?? OR were all the people on the list informed that they were there and Louis is just fibbing when he said he did not know.
Either way it is pretty bad. So what is it Louis? Were some the 400 put there without their knowledge or were you telling a bit of a fib????? I am sure we really need an answer here as most people don't like fibbers that are caught out.
"Still waiting for the empirical (read experimental) support for your Oil theory, by the way."
Do I really have to? I am still waiting for the oil wells that replenish, Oil without biomarkers and where oil has been found where abiotic oil theory predicted it would be. So far your petroleum geologist peers have found a couple of trillion barrels of oil where the biotic theory would predict it would be. So the current score is:
Biotic theory of oil formation ~2 trillion barrels
Abiotic theory of oil formation 0 barrels
Not convincing to a person of your beliefs however to anyone else, including your peers, it would be pretty conclusive.
Posted by: Ender at January 5, 2008 12:03 AM
___________________________________ end of extract ____________________________________
I will be interested in his response.
Comments